Re: [PATCH] sysctl: fix false positives when PROC_SYSCTL=n

[Eric W. Biederman]

Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Having ->procname but not ->proc_handler is valid when PROC_SYSCTL=n,
> people use such combination to reduce ifdefs with non-standard handlers.
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14408

Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

It looks like I messed up when I wrote sysctl_check.c and used the
wrong ifdef.  Silly me.  Especially since I had added PROC_SYSCTL
earlier.

Eric


> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>  kernel/sysctl_check.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sysctl_check.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl_check.c
> @@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ int sysctl_check_table(struct nsproxy *namespaces, struct ctl_table *table)
>  			if (!table->ctl_name && table->strategy)
>  				set_fail(&fail, table, "Strategy without ctl_name");
>  #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
>  			if (table->procname && !table->proc_handler)
>  				set_fail(&fail, table, "No proc_handler");
>  #endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/