Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush threadbreakpoints in flush_thread().

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:40:04PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:19:55PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:23:06PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > [ I noticed this whilst hacking up SH support, applies to the current
> > >   tracing/hw-breakpoints topic branch. ]
> > > 
> > > flush_thread() tries to do a TIF_DEBUG check before calling in to
> > > flush_thread_hw_breakpoint() (which subsequently clears the thread flag),
> > > but for some reason, the x86 code is manually clearing TIF_DEBUG
> > > immediately before the test, so this path will never be taken.
> > > 
> > > This kills off the erroneous clear_tsk_thread_flag() and lets
> > > flush_thread_hw_breakpoint() actually get invoked.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, this is wrong and we missed it. Thanks for fixing!
> > 
> > > Presumably folks were getting lucky with testing and the
> > > free_thread_info() -> free_thread_xstate() path was taking care of the
> > > flush there.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Acked-by: K.Prasad <prasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > 
> Ingo, are you planning on picking this up? Or is there a hw-breakpoints
> tree somewhere outside of -tip that I'm unaware of?


I'm picking it.
Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/