Re: [PATCH v2] [x86] detect and report lack of NX protections

[Kees Cook]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:18:43AM +0900, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/20/2009 11:04 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >It is possible for x86_64 systems to lack the NX bit (see check_efer())
> >either due to the hardware lacking support or the BIOS having turned
> >off the CPU capability, so NX status should be reported.  Additionally,
> >anyone booting NX-capable CPUs in 32bit mode without PAE will lack NX
> >functionality, so this change provides feedback for that case as well.
> >
> >v2: use "Alert:" instead of "Warning:" to avoid confusiong with WARN_ON()
> >
> 
> They're both wrong.  Both imply that the user needs to take an
> action, which is wrong because the kernel is working as intended.
> If you need to use any kind of alert word, it should be something
> like "Notice:", and it should be KERN_NOTICE or even KERN_INFO.

In the case of a system where the BIOS was shipped with XD not enabled,
the user needs to take an action.  I'm okay with switching to Notice:, but
I don't think KERN_INFO is right.  I would agree, "Alert:" would seem to
be a KERN_ALERT, which is above KERN_CRIT, which this is clearly not.
"Notice" it is.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/