Re: Fwd: [PATCH] [RFC] ataflop: remove buggy IRQ disable fromdo_fd_request()

[Michael Schmitz]

Hi Jiri,

> > > Please elaborate a little bit more which of the two points above you base 
> > > your NACK on.
> > 
> > The removal of local_irq_disable() (which should have been local_irq_enable()) 
> > just raised a flag, and I didn't immediately see why the interrupt enable had 
> > been commented out. 
> 
> Yes, it has been commented out in a very non-intuitive way.

That. too :-) What I meant to say - the reason why someone chose to comment out 
the original sti() wasn't really clear. I guess the reason for that particular 
change has been lost in the pre-git or bk era.
 
> > With a bit of further thought on the matter I am satisfied that this patch will 
> > not impact on driver function at all, and do not wish to sustain my objection.
> > 
> > IOW: Ack, and my sincere apologies for wasting your time. 
> 
> Thanks, I have added
> 
> 	Acked-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> to the patch changelog in my tree.

That's right ...

	Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/