Re: [PATCH -tip tracing/kprobes 0/9] tracing/kprobes, perf: perfprobe and kprobe-tracer bugfixes

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 02:18:24PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 01:00:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 09:51:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > So, what would you think about using -D (def) and -U (undef) ?
> > > The simpest case should be no extra character at all:
> > >   perf probe schedule
> > Yeah, I really prefer that too.
> 
> /me too
>  
> > If you want more precision, it also means you have you code editor opened
> > and want to set a precise point. Since you also have the absolute
> > line directly displayed by your editor, you don't want to calculate the relative
> > line but rather the absolute one.
> 
> Perhaps this should come with vim/emacs key bindings so that all this
> gets hidden by just opening the source code and pressing
> control+SOMEKEY?
> 
> - Arnaldo


Yep, would be a nice idea.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/