Re: include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h kernel 2.6.31.4

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> I lately compiled some app that stumbled across this, and someone smarter than
> me should judge if this is right or wrong:
> 
> 
> * asm-generic/int-ll64.h
>  *
>  * Integer declarations for architectures which use "long long"
>  * for 64-bit types.
>  */
> 
> #ifndef _ASM_GENERIC_INT_LL64_H
> #define _ASM_GENERIC_INT_LL64_H
> 
> #include <asm/bitsperlong.h>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> 
> Is it correct to include from linked "asm" instead of asm-generic ?
> 
> My link goes to "asm-x86" but for some reason asm-generic/types.h is included
> which ends at int-ll64.h trying to include a not existing bitsperlong.h from
> directory asm-x86.

Hi Stephan,

Most likely you are using the kernel headers in an unsupported way, like
trying to point to $(HOME)/linux-2.6/include for include files when building
an application.

Please see http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelHeaders for how to fix that.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/