Re: [PATCH v2] eeepc-laptop: simplify parse_arg()

[Darren Hart]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:37:39PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > parse_arg() has three possible return values:
> >     -EINVAL if sscanf(), in short, fails;
> >     zero if "count" is zero; and
> >     "count" in all other cases
> > 
> > But "count" will never be zero. See, parse_arg() is called by the
> > various store functions. And the callchain of these functions starts
> > with sysfs_kf_write(). And that function checks for a zero "count". So
> > we can stop checking for a zero "count", drop the "count" argument
> > entirely, and transform parse_arg() into a function that returns zero on
> > success or a negative error. That, in turn, allows to make those store
> > functions just return "count" on success. The net effect is that the
> > code becomes a bit easier to understand.
> > 
> > While we're at it, let store_sys_acpi() return whatever error set_acpi()
> > returns instead of remapping it to EIO.
> > 
> > A nice side effect is that this GCC warning is silenced too:
> >     drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c: In function âstore_sys_acpiâ:
> >     drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c:279:10: warning: âvalueâ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >       int rv, value;
> > 
> > Which is, of course, the reason to have a look at parse_arg().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Queued, thanks Paul.

After discussion with Linus, I have had to drop this patch from the queue. We
need to restore the -EIO error code mapping to store_sys_acpi().

Apologies for the run around here, we had to define some policy around this.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/