Re: [PATCH] x86/vdso: Add prctl to set per-process VDSO load

From: Kevin Easton
Date: Wed Sep 17 2014 - 06:37:03 EST


On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:05:51PM -0700, Richard Larocque wrote:
> + case PR_SET_VDSO:
> + if (arg2 == PR_VDSO_ENABLE)
> + me->signal->disable_vdso = 0;
> + else if (arg2 == PR_VDSO_DISABLE)
> + me->signal->disable_vdso = 1;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + case PR_GET_VDSO:
> + if (!me->signal->disable_vdso)
> + error = put_user(PR_VDSO_ENABLE, (int __user *)arg2);
> + else
> + error = put_user(PR_VDSO_DISABLE, (int __user *)arg2);
> + break;

Perhaps both of those should do

if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;

- Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/