Re: [PATCH 3/7] sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:25:39PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 20.09.2014 22:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 08:51:28PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> dl_bw_of() dereferences rq->rd which has to have RCU read lock held.
> >> Probability of use-after-free and memory corruption aren't zero here.
> >>
> > 
> > Additionally we might want to add something like:
> > lockdep_assert_held_rcu() and put that in dl_bw_of() and other such
> > places.
> 
> Should we change (not now, in general) RCU-related pointers to use
> rcu_dereference() to have unlocked RCU warnings in dmesg? To catch
> a problems like that.
> 
> This may make code worse readable though.

Possibly, we should probably use rcu_assign_pointer() and
rcu_dereference() on rq->rd. Sometimes you can avoid that if you're
playing games with static objects, but I don't think that is true here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/