[PATCH 8/8] nohz: nohz full depends on irq work self IPI support
From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Sat Sep 20 2014 - 16:31:09 EST
The nohz full functionality depends on IRQ work to trigger its own
interrupts. As it's used to restart the tick, we can't rely on the tick
fallback for irq work callbacks, ie: we can't use the tick to restart
the tick itself.
Lets reject the full dynticks initialization if that arch support isn't
available.
As a side effect, this makes sure that nohz kick is never called from
the tick. That otherwise would result in illegal hrtimer self-cancellation
and lockup.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index eb4af01..5a9ff24 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -365,6 +365,20 @@ void __init tick_nohz_init(void)
return;
}
+ /*
+ * Full dynticks uses irq work to drive the tick rescheduling on safe
+ * locking contexts. But then we need irq work to raise its own
+ * interrupts to avoid circular dependency on the tick
+ */
+ if (!arch_irq_work_has_interrupt()) {
+ pr_warning("NO_HZ: Can't run full dynticks because arch doesn't "
+ "support irq work self-IPIs\n");
+ cpumask_clear(tick_nohz_full_mask);
+ cpumask_copy(housekeeping_mask, cpu_possible_mask);
+ tick_nohz_full_running = false;
+ return;
+ }
+
cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/