RE: [patch 22/26] x86: Add proper vector accounting for HyperV

[Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-kernel-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Gleixner
> Sent: Sunday, 23 February, 2014 3:40 PM
> To: LKML
> Cc: Ingo Molnar; Peter Zijlstra; x86; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; K. Y. Srinivasan
> Subject: [patch 22/26] x86: Add proper vector accounting for HyperV
> 
> HyperV abuses a device interrupt to account for the
> HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR.
> 
> Provide proper accounting as we have for the other vectors as well.
...
> Index: tip/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> +++ tip/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file
>  		seq_printf(p, "%10u ", per_cpu(mce_poll_count, j));
>  	seq_printf(p, "  Machine check polls\n");
>  #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_HYPERV) || defined(CONFIG_XEN)
> +	seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "THR");
> +	for_each_online_cpu(j)
> +		seq_printf(p, "%10u ", irq_stats(j)->irq_hv_callback_count);
> +	seq_printf(p, "  Hypervisor callback interrupts\n");
> +#endif
...

Should this have used a different short string than "THR",
which is already used for "Threshold APIC interrupts"?

---
Rob Elliott    HP Server Storage



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/