Re: Stupid NVIDIA 3D vgaarb.c patch

[Alex Williamson]

On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 13:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Adding proper people and mailing lists..
> 
> The PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA test goes back to the very beginning by
> BenH, and I have no idea if adding PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_3D is
> appropriate, but hopefully somebody does. The fact that it makes
> things work certainly argues fairly convincingly for it, but I want
> some backup here.
> 
> Dave, BenH?

TBH, it seems pretty dubious to me.  There's nothing in the spec that
would give us reason to believe that a device with a 3D controller class
code requires VGA arbitration.  Also, if this controller starts
participating in arbitration then this same laptop will likely disable
DRI when Intel is the primary graphics due to Xorg wanting to mmap VGA
MMIO space.  I'm not sure what the solution is, but unfortunately it's
likely to be much more complicated than this patch.  Thanks,

Alex

> Christopher(?), can you please also specify which laptop etc. And the
> patch itself seems to have come from somebody else, unless you're
> Lekensteyn. So we'd want to get the provenance of that too.
> 
>                 Linus
> 
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:28 PM, C BergstrÃm <cbergstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > I don't know who the original author is and I can have one of the distro
> > graphics friends review it, but I need this patch below to get NVIDIA
> > drivers to work (without using any Intel graphics) on my laptop
> > http://pastebin.com/wpmFi38k
> >
> > Sorry - I know this is not the proper way to submit a patch, but it's
> > trivial and I'm not a kernel dev.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ./C



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/