Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix stmmac_pci_probe failed when CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is selected

[Giuseppe CAVALLARO]

On 9/23/2014 3:16 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Miller [mailto:davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2:19 AM
> > From: Kweh Hock Leong <hock.leong.kweh@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:34:10 +0800
> >
> > Giuseppe, Kweh, where are we with this patch?
>
> We are discussing whether this is the correct fix to the issue. Below is the discussion log:
>
> > > Hmm I am not sure this is the right fix. The driver has to fail if the
> > > main clock is not found. Indeed dev_warn has to be changed in dev_err.
> > >
> > > Take a look at Documentation/networking/stmmac.txt but I will post
> > > some patch to improve the documentation adding further detail for clocks too.
> > >
> > > The the logic behind the code is that the CSR clock will be set at
> > > runtime if in case of priv->plat->clk_csr ==0 or it will be forced to
> > > a fixed value if passed from the platform instead of.
> > > IIRC This was required on some platforms time ago.
> > > For sure the driver is designed to fail in case of no main clock is found.
> > >
> > > Peppe
> >
> > Hi Peppe,
> >
> > I understand your point from the code below (at file stmmac_main.c line 2784):
> >
> > /* If a specific clk_csr value is passed from the platform
> >    * this means that the CSR Clock Range selection cannot be
> >    * changed at run-time and it is fixed. Viceversa the driver'll try to
> >    * set the MDC clock dynamically according to the csr actual
> >    * clock input.
> >    */
> > if (!priv->plat->clk_csr)
> >          stmmac_clk_csr_set(priv);
> > else
> >          priv->clk_csr = priv->plat->clk_csr;
> >
> >
> > I did search through the whole stmmac_main.c file and found that only stmmac_clk_csr_set()
> > function is leveraging the priv->stmmac_clk params for it calculation. By the logic point of view,
> > I do not need priv->stmmac_clk when I got priv->plat->clk_csr. With this thinking, I propose this
> > fix as when the probe get priv->plat->clk_csr, it shouldn't fail if priv->stmmac_clk has the error value.
>
> Hi Peppe,
>
> Are you trying to tell that if there is a fix CSR clock value, but driver cannot obtain the clk from devm_clk_get()
> (even it is not in use), the driver should fail the probe?
>
> You have a case with this condition:
> HW allow SW to discover the STMMAC controller but HW/SW configures not to supply the CLOCK to STMMAC controller?
>
> My understanding to these priv->plat->clk_csr and priv->stmmac_clk is that 1st one is fixed and 2nd one is dynamic.
> When fixed value occurs, dynamic one would not be use. Do I understand this correctly?

the logic is: the priv->stmmac_clk must be always provided from the
platform then we have two cases:

1) if priv->plat->clk_csr is also passed then it will be adopt in the
   mdio functions to program the Reg4[5:2]
   This was required in the past IIRC on SPEAr platforms.

2) if priv->plat->clk_csr is not passed from the platform then the
   priv->clk_csr will be set according to the priv->stmmac_clk
   and always used in the mdio part.

So IIUC now you are asking for not passing the priv->stmmac_clk
and warning this event w/o failing. Why you cannot pass this clock?

peppe


> Thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
> Wilson

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/