[PATCH v3 1/3] sched: fix confusing PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS constant

[Zefan Li]

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Commit 1d4457f99928 ("sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags")
defined PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS as hexadecimal value, but it is confusing
because it is used as bit number. Redefine it as decimal bit number.

Note this changes the bit position of PFA_NOW_NEW_PRIVS from 1 to 0.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ lizf: slightly modified subject and changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 5c2c885..4557765 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
 }
 
 /* Per-process atomic flags. */
-#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001	/* May not gain new privileges. */
+#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0	/* May not gain new privileges. */
 
 static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-- 
1.8.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/