Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT for PRECDIST

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:22:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:02:58AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:49:08PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > The earlier commit 86a04461a made near all PEBS on
> > > > Sandy/IvyBridge/Haswell to reject non zero flags.
> > > 
> > > What's magic about nehalem and westmere?
> > 
> > I wasn't able to confirm their behavior explicitly, so I felt
> > it best to leave them alone.
> > 
> > But in principle adding the _FLAGS changes there too would
> > make sense too.
> 
> Yeah please do that patch ASAP, having PEBS behave differently across
> uarchs is wrong.

Ping!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/