-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Phillips [mailto:kim.phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:53 AM
To: Rivera Jose-B46482
Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yoder Stuart-B08248; Wood Scott-
B07421; agraf@xxxxxxx; linuxppc-release@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] drivers/bus: Freescale Management Complex bus driver patch series
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:49:38 -0500
"J. German Rivera" <German.Rivera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CHANGE HISTORY
Issues pending resolution not addressed by v2:
- What to do with Doxygen comments in patch 1
It's clear they should be removed.
- Whether to move or not FSL-specific header files added in include/linux,
by this patch series, to another location
there wasn't a valid objection against moving them under fsl/ and
changing them to use dashes instead of underscores, was there?
There was no objection, but here is the observation. The current
convention seems to be that under include/linux are 'subsystem'
types--
include/linux/mmc
include/linux/spi
include/linux/raid
etc
There is no other "company" that has an include/linux/[company-name] that I can
see. Freescale seems to be the only one. And there is only a single driver
in there. So it looks like a complete anomaly.
Why is that?
I guess we could try moving our stuff to incluce/linux/fsl and see if there is
any negative feedback on it.
Stuart--