Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched,mips,ia64: Remove __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
From: Kirill Tkhai
Date: Tue Sep 23 2014 - 11:16:55 EST
23.09.2014, 19:06, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:36:18PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Architectures, which define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW,
>> may pull a task when it's in the middle of schedule().
>>
>> CPU1(task1 calls schedule) CPU2
>> ... schedule()
>> ... idle_balance()
>> ... load_balance()
>> ... ...
>> schedule() ...
>> prepare_lock_switch() ...
>> raw_spin_unlock(&rq1->lock) ...
>> ... raw_spin_lock(&rq1->lock)
>> ... detach_tasks();
>> ... can_migrate_task(task1)
>> ... attach_tasks(); <--- move task1 to rq2
>> ... raw_spin_unlock(&rq1->lock)
>> ... context_switch() <--- switch to task1's stack
>> ... ...
>> (using task1's stack) (using task1's stack)
>> ... ...
>> context_switch() ...
>>
>> Parallel use of a single stack is not a good idea.
>
> Indeed it is, but how about we do this instead?
Completely agree, looks good for me.
> ---
> Subject: sched,mips,ia64: Remove __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
>
> Kirill found that there's a subtle race in the
> __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW code, and instead of fixing it, remove the
> entire exception because neither arch that uses it seems to actually
> still require it.
>
> Boot tested on mips64el (qemu) only.
>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (one more review of ia64 part)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/