Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Make mmap callback actually optional
From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Mon Apr 01 2019 - 03:14:13 EST
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 11:52:01AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> The docs state the callback is optional but it is not, make it optional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
There's a bunch of dummy mmap implementations we could remove with this,
would be nice to follow up.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 7c858020d14b..4d4ae9fe9ac8 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>
> dmabuf = file->private_data;
>
> + /* check if buffer supports mmap */
> + if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* check for overflowing the buffer's size */
> if (vma->vm_pgoff + vma_pages(vma) >
> dmabuf->size >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> @@ -404,8 +408,7 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(const struct dma_buf_export_info *exp_info)
> || !exp_info->ops
> || !exp_info->ops->map_dma_buf
> || !exp_info->ops->unmap_dma_buf
> - || !exp_info->ops->release
> - || !exp_info->ops->mmap)) {
> + || !exp_info->ops->release)) {
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> @@ -906,6 +909,10 @@ int dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !vma))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* check if buffer supports mmap */
> + if (!dmabuf->ops->mmap)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* check for offset overflow */
> if (pgoff + vma_pages(vma) < pgoff)
> return -EOVERFLOW;
> --
> 2.21.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch