[PATCH 5.0 023/146] tipc: allow service ranges to be connect()ed on RDM/DGRAM
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Apr 01 2019 - 13:05:11 EST
5.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit ea239314fe42ace880bdd834256834679346c80e ]
We move the check that prevents connecting service ranges to after
the RDM/DGRAM check, and move address sanity control to a separate
function that also validates the service range.
Fixes: 23998835be98 ("tipc: improve address sanity check in tipc_connect()")
Signed-off-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/tipc/socket.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/tipc/socket.c
+++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
@@ -2349,6 +2349,16 @@ static int tipc_wait_for_connect(struct
return 0;
}
+static bool tipc_sockaddr_is_sane(struct sockaddr_tipc *addr)
+{
+ if (addr->family != AF_TIPC)
+ return false;
+ if (addr->addrtype == TIPC_SERVICE_RANGE)
+ return (addr->addr.nameseq.lower <= addr->addr.nameseq.upper);
+ return (addr->addrtype == TIPC_SERVICE_ADDR ||
+ addr->addrtype == TIPC_SOCKET_ADDR);
+}
+
/**
* tipc_connect - establish a connection to another TIPC port
* @sock: socket structure
@@ -2384,18 +2394,18 @@ static int tipc_connect(struct socket *s
if (!tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk))
res = -EINVAL;
goto exit;
- } else if (dst->family != AF_TIPC) {
- res = -EINVAL;
}
- if (dst->addrtype != TIPC_ADDR_ID && dst->addrtype != TIPC_ADDR_NAME)
+ if (!tipc_sockaddr_is_sane(dst)) {
res = -EINVAL;
- if (res)
goto exit;
-
+ }
/* DGRAM/RDM connect(), just save the destaddr */
if (tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk)) {
memcpy(&tsk->peer, dest, destlen);
goto exit;
+ } else if (dst->addrtype == TIPC_SERVICE_RANGE) {
+ res = -EINVAL;
+ goto exit;
}
previous = sk->sk_state;