On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:02:37PM +0800, Chen, Rong A wrote:
On 4/1/2019 10:29 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:Can you please provide any logs that would point at btrfs? If the module
On 2019/4/1 äå10:02, Chen, Rong A wrote:
On 4/1/2019 9:28 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:So there is no regression at that commit right?
On 1.04.19 Ð. 16:24 Ñ., kernel test robot wrote:Hi,
FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):Can this report be made useful by actually including output from serial
commit: 70d28b0e4f8ed2d38571e7b1f9bec7f321a53102 ("btrfs:
tree-checker: Verify dev item")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
in testcase: trinity
with following parameters:
ÂÂÂÂruntime: 300s
test-description: Trinity is a linux system call fuzz tester.
test-url: http://codemonkey.org.uk/projects/trinity/
on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp
2 -m 2G
caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire
log/backtrace):
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
|
| 36b9d2bc69 | 70d28b0e4f |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
|
boot_successes
| 14ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ | 0ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ |
|
boot_failures
| 2ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ | 14ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ |
|
IP-Config:Auto-configuration_of_network_failed
| 2ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ |ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ |
|
BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_early-boot_stage,last_printk:Probing_EDD(edd=off_to_disable)...ok
| 0ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ | 14ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
early console in setup code
Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... ok
BUG: kernel reboot-without-warning in early-boot stage, last printk:
Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... ok
Linux version 5.0.0-rc8-00196-g70d28b0 #1
Command line: ip=::::vm-snb-quantal-x86_64-1415::dhcp root=/dev/ram0
user=lkp
job=/lkp/jobs/scheduled/vm-snb-quantal-x86_64-1415/trinity-300s-quantal-core-x86_64-2018-11-09.cgz-70d28b0-20190330-29362-1y6g0qb-2.yaml
ARCH=x86_64 kconfig=x86_64-randconfig-s5-03231928
branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2019032317
commit=70d28b0e4f8ed2d38571e7b1f9bec7f321a53102
BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-randconfig-s5-03231928/gcc-7/70d28b0e4f8ed2d38571e7b1f9bec7f321a53102/vmlinuz-5.0.0-rc8-00196-g70d28b0
max_uptime=1500
RESULT_ROOT=/result/trinity/300s/vm-snb-quantal-x86_64/quantal-core-x86_64-2018-11-09.cgz/x86_64-randconfig-s5-03231928/gcc-7/70d28b0e4f8ed2d38571e7b1f9bec7f321a53102/8
LKP_SERVER=inn debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled
rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100 net.ifnames=0 printk.devkmsg=on
panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic
load_ramdisk=2 prompt_ramdisk=0 drbd.minor_count=8
systemd.log_level=err ignore_loglevel console=tty0
earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 console=ttyS0,115200 vga=normal rw
rcuperf.shutdown=0
console? For example possible bug-ons or whatnot? dmesg.xz just contains
qemu's command line + some metadata about the test and :
"BUG: kernel reboot-without-warning in early-boot stage, last printk:
Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... ok"
At least a stack trace would have been useful.
<snip>
We usually use the tool ("bin/lkp qemu -k <bzImage> job-script") to
reproduce it. It seems no stack trace in the result:
Just some false alert?
Hi,
I think there's a regression, it stopped in the early-boot stage .
is loaded or built-in started, there's a line about that. Besides that
it's preceded by messages from other subsystems' initialization.
_______________________________________________
LKP mailing list
LKP@xxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp