Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] lib: rework bitmap_parselist and tests

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 07:45:35AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> bitmap_parselist has been evolved from a pretty simple idea for long and
> now lacks for refactoring. It is not structured, has nested loops and a
> set of opaque-named variables.
> 
> Things are more complicated because bitmap_parselist() is a part of user
> interface, and its behavior should not change.
> 
> In this patchset
>  - bitmap_parselist_user() made a wrapper on bitmap_parselist();
>  - bitmap_parselist() reworked (patch 2);
>  - time measurement in test_bitmap_parselist switched to ktime_get
>    (patch 3);
>  - new tests introduced (patch 4), and
>  - bitmap_parselist_user() testing enabled with the same testset as
>    bitmap_parselist() (patch 5).

Thanks for an update. Result looks good, though few comments per individual patches.

> 
> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/23/50
> v2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3048976.html
> v3: Implementation of an approach with copying the data to
>     kernel space in bitmap_parselist_user() instead of parsing
>     user data byte by byte. For me, it looks better than v2.
> 
> Yury Norov (5):
>   lib: make bitmap_parselist_user() a wrapper on bitmap_parselist()
>   lib: rework bitmap_parselist
>   lib/test_bitmap: switch test_bitmap_parselist to ktime_get()
>   lib/test_bitmap: add testcases for bitmap_parselist
>   lib/test_bitmap: add tests for bitmap_parselist_user
> 
>  lib/bitmap.c      | 285 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  lib/test_bitmap.c |  67 ++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko