Hey Lu,
Iâve attached a preliminary v3, if you could take a look and run some tests
that would be great.
Since v2 iâve added your default domain type patches, the new device_group
handler, and incorporated Jacobâs feedback.
On 28 Mar 2019, at 18:37, James Sewart <jamessewart@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Lu,
On 26 Mar 2019, at 01:24, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi James,
On 3/25/19 8:57 PM, James Sewart wrote:
Theyâre not allocated and not freed currently, only type IOMMU_RESV_MSI isTheres an issue that if we choose to alloc a new resv_region with typeDo you mean the rmrr regions are not allocated in get_resv_regions, but
IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT, we will need to refactor intel_iommu_put_resv_regions
to free this entry type which means refactoring the rmrr regions in
get_resv_regions. Should this work be in this patchset?
are freed in put_resv_regions? I think we should fix this in this patch
set since this might impact the device passthrough if we don't do it.
freed in put_resv_regions. If we allocate a new resv_region with type
IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT for the isa region, then it wonât be freed. If we modify
put_resv_regions to free type IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT, then we will try to free
the static RMRR regions.
Either the ISA region is static and not freed as with my implementation,
or the RMRR regions are converted to be allocated on each call to
get_resv_regions and freed in put_resv_regions.
By the way, there's another way in my mind. Let's add a new region type
for LPC devices, e.x. IOMMU_RESV_LPC, and then handle it in the same way
as those MSI regions. Just FYI.
This solution would require adding some extra code to
iommu_group_create_direct_mappings as currently only type
IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT is identity mapped, other types are only reserved.
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
Cheers,
James.
Cheers,
James.