Re: [PATCH v1] clk: Probe defer clk_get() on orphans

[Jeffrey Hugo]

On 3/21/2019 8:50 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 3/6/2019 4:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-03-06 13:48:13)
> > > Ping?
> > >
> > > Stephen, I know as this depends on your clock parent handling series
> > > (happens to apply just fine to v2), its not going to be accepted until
> > > that gets sorted out, but do you have any thoughts on if this seems like
> > > an appropriate thing to do, or if you'd like to see a different 
> > > solution?
> >
> > Please don't ping during the merge window. I'll probably look at this
> > patch next week.
>
> Sorry about pinging during the merge window. At the time, I just 
> realized the patch has been on list for several weeks with no response, 
> but hadn't connected the dots that it happened to be the merge window at 
> that particular moment.
>
> Any update on when you think you might get around to having a look at this?

Ping? (again)

--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.