Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] arch/x86: add the support of ACRN guest
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Apr 05 2019 - 15:01:10 EST
Zhao,
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Zhao Yakui wrote:
Vs. the Subject line: arch/x86: add the support of ACRN guest
The proper prefix for x86 is surprisingly 'x86:' not 'arch/x86:'. Also
please start the first word after the colon with an upper case letter.
> ACRN is one open-source hypervisour, which is maintained by Linux
s/one/an/
> foundation.
by the Linuxfoundation.
> This is to add the para-virtualization support so that
> it allows the Linux guest to run on acrn-hypervisor.
>
> This adds x86_hyper_acrn into supported hypervisors array, which enables
> Linux ACRN guest running on ACRN hypervisor. It is restricted to X86_64.
Please do not use 'This is to add' or 'This adds'. Just say:
Add ....
> v1->v2: Change the CONFIG_ACRN to CONFIG_ACRN_GUEST, which makes it easy to
> understand.
> Remove the export of x86_hyper_acrn.
Thanks for having the version changes documented, but please put them after
the '---' line below and add another '---' before the diffstat. These
changes are not part of the final change log and if they are below then I
don't have to strip them manually.
> Co-developed-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/acrn.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c | 4 ++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/acrn.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index c1f9b3c..d73225e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -842,6 +842,14 @@ config JAILHOUSE_GUEST
> cell. You can leave this option disabled if you only want to start
> Jailhouse and run Linux afterwards in the root cell.
>
> +config ACRN_GUEST
> + bool "ACRN Guest support"
> + depends on X86_64 && PARAVIRT
Why does this select PARAVIRT? The current patches are not implementing
anything of the paravirt functionality. Which part of paravirtualization
are you going to provide?
Thanks,
tglx