Re: [patch V2 08/29] x86/cpu_entry_area: Cleanup setup functions

From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Fri Apr 05 2019 - 15:25:58 EST

Next message: Madhumitha Prabakaran: "[PATCH] Staging: olpc_dcon: Use WARN_ON() instead of BUG_ON()"
Previous message: Waiman Long: "[PATCH-tip v2 02/12] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch V2 08/29] x86/cpu_entry_area: Cleanup setup functions"
Next in thread: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch V2 07/29] x86/exceptions: Make IST index zero based"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 05:07:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> No point in retrieving the entry area pointer over and over. Do it once and
> use unsigned int for 'cpu' consistently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

"consistent" might be a bit of a stretch for 'unsigned int cpu' vs 'int cpu' :-)

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>

Next message: Madhumitha Prabakaran: "[PATCH] Staging: olpc_dcon: Use WARN_ON() instead of BUG_ON()"
Previous message: Waiman Long: "[PATCH-tip v2 02/12] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch V2 08/29] x86/cpu_entry_area: Cleanup setup functions"
Next in thread: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch V2 07/29] x86/exceptions: Make IST index zero based"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]