Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: int340x_thermal: Remove unnecessary acpi_has_method() uses

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu Jul 18 2019 - 04:37:02 EST


On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 9:26:39 PM CEST Kelsey Skunberg wrote:
> acpi_evaluate_object() will already return in error if the method does not
> exist. Checking if the method is absent before the acpi_evaluate_object()
> call is not needed. Remove acpi_has_method() calls to avoid additional
> work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <skunberg.kelsey@xxxxxxxxx>

LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
> index 9716bc3abaf9..7130e90773ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
> @@ -77,9 +77,6 @@ int acpi_parse_trt(acpi_handle handle, int *trt_count, struct trt **trtp,
> struct acpi_buffer element = { 0, NULL };
> struct acpi_buffer trt_format = { sizeof("RRNNNNNN"), "RRNNNNNN" };
>
> - if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_TRT"))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_TRT", NULL, &buffer);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -158,9 +155,6 @@ int acpi_parse_art(acpi_handle handle, int *art_count, struct art **artp,
> struct acpi_buffer art_format = {
> sizeof("RRNNNNNNNNNNN"), "RRNNNNNNNNNNN" };
>
> - if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_ART"))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_ART", NULL, &buffer);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -ENODEV;
>