[PATCH v4 2/5] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Remove post_div_table checks

[Vinod Koul]

We want users to code properly and fix the post_div_table missing and
not rely on core to check. So remove the post_div_table check.

Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
index b48707693ffd..2c6773188761 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
@@ -1036,11 +1036,6 @@ static unsigned long clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	u32 i, div = 1, val;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!pll->post_div_table) {
-		pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	ret = regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -1063,11 +1058,6 @@ static long clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 {
 	struct clk_alpha_pll_postdiv *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll_postdiv(hw);
 
-	if (!pll->post_div_table) {
-		pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, prate, pll->post_div_table,
 				pll->width, CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST);
 }
@@ -1089,11 +1079,6 @@ static int clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	if (val & PLL_VOTE_FSM_ENA)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!pll->post_div_table) {
-		pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(parent_rate, rate);
 	for (i = 0; i < pll->num_post_div; i++) {
 		if (pll->post_div_table[i].div == div) {
-- 
2.20.1