Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page Pool

[Robin Murphy]

On 23/07/2019 11:07, Jose Abreu wrote:
> From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Jul/23/2019, 11:01:24 (UTC+00:00)
>
> > This appears to be a winner and by disabling the SMMU for the ethernet
> > controller and reverting commit 954a03be033c7cef80ddc232e7cbdb17df735663
> > this worked! So yes appears to be related to the SMMU being enabled. We
> > had to enable the SMMU for ethernet recently due to commit
> > 954a03be033c7cef80ddc232e7cbdb17df735663.
>
> Finally :)
>
> However, from "git show 954a03be033c7cef80ddc232e7cbdb17df735663":
>
> +         There are few reasons to allow unmatched stream bypass, and
> +         even fewer good ones.  If saying YES here breaks your board
> +         you should work on fixing your board.
>
> So, how can we fix this ? Is your ethernet DT node marked as
> "dma-coherent;" ?

The first thing to try would be booting the failing setup with 
"iommu.passthrough=1" (or using CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH) - if 
that makes things seem OK, then the problem is likely related to address 
translation; if not, then it's probably time to start looking at nasties 
like coherency and ordering, although in principle I wouldn't expect the 
SMMU to have too much impact there.

Do you know if the SMMU interrupts are working correctly? If not, it's 
possible that an incorrect address or mapping direction could lead to 
the DMA transaction just being silently terminated without any fault 
indication, which generally presents as inexplicable weirdness (I've 
certainly seen that on another platform with the mix of an unsupported 
interrupt controller and an 'imperfect' ethernet driver).

Just to confirm, has the original patch been tested with 
CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG to rule out any high-level mishaps?

Robin.