Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock

From: Chengfeng Ye
Date: Thu Jul 27 2023 - 01:22:14 EST

Next message: Helge Deller: "Re: mm/kfence/kfence_test.c:287 test_alloc() warn: use 'gfp' here instead of GFP_KERNEL?"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH next resend 5/5] minmax: Relax check to allow comparison between int and small unsigned constants."
In reply to: Chengfeng Ye: "[PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sorry for the interruption, I just notice that the ndlp node
inside timer does not share with that of lpfc_cleanup_pending_mbox().

This is a false alarm and sorry again for this.

Best regards,
Chengfeng

Next message: Helge Deller: "Re: mm/kfence/kfence_test.c:287 test_alloc() warn: use 'gfp' here instead of GFP_KERNEL?"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH next resend 5/5] minmax: Relax check to allow comparison between int and small unsigned constants."
In reply to: Chengfeng Ye: "[PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]