Use of zero-length arrays in bcachefs structures inner fields
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Thu May 23 2024 - 13:53:22 EST
Hi Kent,
Looking around in the bcachefs code for possible causes of this KMSAN
bug report:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000fd5e7006191f78dc@xxxxxxxxxx/
I notice the following pattern in the bcachefs structures: zero-length
arrays members are inserted in structures (not always at the end),
seemingly to achieve a result similar to what could be done with a
union:
fs/bcachefs/bcachefs_format.h:
struct bkey_packed {
__u64 _data[0];
/* Size of combined key and value, in u64s */
__u8 u64s;
[...]
};
likewise:
struct bkey_i {
__u64 _data[0];
struct bkey k;
struct bch_val v;
};
(and there are many more examples of this pattern in bcachefs)
AFAIK, the C11 standard states that array declarator constant expression
delimited by [ ] shall have a value greater than zero.
Effectively, we can verify that this code triggers an undefined behavior
with:
#include <stdio.h>
struct z {
int x[0];
int y;
int z;
} __attribute__((packed));
int main(void)
{
struct z a;
a.y = 1;
printf("%d\n", a.x[0]);
}
clang-15 -fsanitize=undefined -o a a.c
/a
a.c:14:17: runtime error: index 0 out of bounds for type 'int[0]'
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior a.c:14:17 in
1
Also, gcc warns that ISO C forbids zero-size arrays when compiling
with -pedantic:
gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -o a a.c
a.c:4:13: warning: ISO C forbids zero-size array ‘x’ [-Wpedantic]
4 | int x[0];
And clang states that this is only supported as an extension, even though
accessing it seems to be classified as an undefined behavior by UBSAN.
clang-15 -std=c11 -pedantic -o a a.c
a.c:4:8: warning: zero size arrays are an extension [-Wzero-length-array]
int x[0];
So I wonder if the issue reported by KMSAN could be caused by this
pattern ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com