Em Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:55:39AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven escreveu:Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:It was using eprintf that checked if verbose was !zero, when I convertednack...
to pr_*() I made the mistake of changing it to pr_warning which caused
'perf timechart' output to be way too verbose.
if you EVER hit one of these you have a very very serious problem.
hiding that is never the right thing to do. I should make this a fatal
event instead.
OK, so I actually fixed a bug as those messages weren't being noticed if
-v wasn't used! :-)
Please take a look at latest tip to see all those messages.
- Arnaldo