Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: move memcg_update_cache_size to slab_common.c

From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Mon Sep 22 2014 - 16:11:46 EST


On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 07:50:20PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> The only reason why this function lives in memcontrol.c is that it
> depends on memcg_caches_array_size. However, we can pass the new array
> size immediately to it instead of new_id+1 so that it will be free of
> any memcontrol.c dependencies.
>
> So let's move this function to slab_common.c and make it static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>

Looks good. One nit below, but not a show stopper.

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> @@ -646,11 +646,13 @@ int memcg_limited_groups_array_size;
> struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
>
> +static void memcg_free_cache_id(int id);

Any chance you could re-order this code to avoid the forward decl?
memcg_alloc_cache_id() and memcg_free_cache_id() are new functions
anyway, might as well put the definition above the callsites.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/